Posted on Friday, January 07, 2011
NOTICE TO THE BAR
RE: Emergent Amendments to Rules 1:5-6, 4:64-1 and 4:64-2
In light of irregularities in the residential foreclosure practice as reported in sworn deposition testimony in New Jersey and other states, the Court has adopted, on an emergent basis, amendments to Rules 1:5-6, 4:64-1 and 4:64-2. These amendments are effective December 20, 2010. The new rule and the amendments, along with the Order adopting them, appear with this notice. The Court’s Order also contains directions for counsel in pending uncontested residential foreclosure cases.
The rule amendments require plaintiff’s counsel in all residential foreclosure actions to file with the court (1) an affidavit or certification executed by the attorney that the attorney has communicated with an employee or employees of the plaintiff who (a) personally reviewed documents for accuracy and (b) confirmed the accuracy of all court filings in the case to date; (2) the name(s), title(s), and responsibilities of the employee(s) of the plaintiff who provided this information to the attorney; and (3) an affidavit or certification executed by the attorney that all the filings in the case comport with all requirements of Rule 1:4-8(a).
Plaintiff’s counsel shall file such documents (1) immediately upon the commencement of any new residential foreclosure action filed after the effective date of the new rule and amendments, as to the accuracy of the information contained in the complaint, as set forth in Rule 4:64-1(b)(1) through (13); (2) within 60 days in any residential foreclosure action today pending and awaiting judgment, as to the accuracy of the complaint and of any proofs submitted; (3) within 45 days in any residential foreclosure action in which judgment was entered but no sale of the property has yet occurred; and (4) with the motion to enter judgment in all future foreclosure actions in which judgment is sought, as to the accuracy of any proofs submitted pursuant to Rule 4:64-2.
Finally, all counsel are reminded of their obligations under the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct and that, pursuant to Rule 1:4-8(a)(3), an attorney’s signature on any paper filed with a court “certifies that to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,” all “factual allegations have evidentiary support, or, as to specifically identified allegations, they are either likely to have evidentiary support or they will be withdrawn or corrected if reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery indicates insufficient evidentiary support.”
Questions concerning these amendments should be directed to Kevin M. Wolfe, Esq., in the AOC’s Civil Practice Division, at (609) 292-8470 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
/s/ Glenn A. Grant
Glenn A. Grant, J.A.D.
Acting Administrative Director of the Courts
Dated: December 20, 2010